To Be Graded Vintage Uncanny X-Men Keys

Randell’s Nerdy Things here…

I’ve officially reached that point in my collecting journey where some books deserve the next level of respect: grading.

These are my vintage The Uncanny X-Men keys that I’m lining up for submission:

📚 The Lineup:

• #15

• #17

• #24

• #25

• #36

• #55

• #58

• #97

• #99

• #116

• #153

• Uncanny X-Men Annual #1

This isn’t about chasing slabs for clout.
It’s about preservation.
It’s about protecting history.
It’s about honoring the journey these books have been on for decades.

Some of these have survived multiple owners, moves, long boxes, dollar bins, convention floors, and who knows what else. And now they’re part of my collection. That matters to me.

These issues represent:
✔️ The Silver → Bronze Age transition
✔️ The rise of the Claremont/Cockrum/Byrne era
✔️ The foundation of modern X-Men
✔️ Some of the most important storytelling Marvel ever produced

Grading doesn’t make a book “better.”
It just helps make sure it’s still here for the next generation of collectors.

And honestly? I’m proud of this stack. Every single one was hunted, saved for, traded for, or waited patiently for.

No shortcuts. No hype flips. Just real collecting.

Support your local artist, support your local comic book shop (LCS) and keep collecting.

🚀 Cyberpunk 2077 Trading Card Game Announced — Coming This March! 💥

 Get ready, runners — the Cyberpunk 2077 universe is expanding beyond screens and dice! A Cyberpunk 2077 Trading Card Game is on the way, launching this March, and it’s shaping up to be one of the most exciting ways to dive deeper into Night City and its cast.

🎴 What We Know So Far

• 🗓️ Release Window: This March

• 🧠 Setting: The gritty, neon-lit streets of Night City

• ⚔️ Gameplay: Strategic card battles & narrative encounters (details still dripping out)

• 🎭 Characters & Factions: Expect familiar faces, gangs, corporations, and iconic Cyberpunk lore

• 🛠️ Mechanics: Likely a blend of tactical play and thematic flavor — think decks built around edgerunners, cyberware, missions, and high-stakes street combat

📍 Why It Matters
For fans of Cyberpunk 2077, this TCG isn’t just merch — it’s a chance to:

• Recreate Night City conflicts around the table

• Collect legendary characters in card form

• Build thematic decks (Solo Netrunner vibes, anyone?)

• Extend the world beyond the video game

🤝 A Cross-Media Expansion
Card games are booming, and this move puts Cyberpunk 2077 alongside other major IPs that have successfully bridged video games and tabletop gameplay. Whether you’re a card gamer, tabletop fan, or just love Night City lore, there’s a lot to be excited about.

---

📌 Pro Tip: Keep an eye on official announcements and previews — we should start seeing card mechanics, art reveals, and pre-order info as March gets closer. This could become a must-collect for both card gamers and Cyberpunk completists alike.

Want me to break down:

• Potential gameplay mechanics based on previews?

• What factions or characters might appear?

• How it compares to other TCGs?

Just let me know! 💬

Another Legend Taken From Us.

 

The comic world just lost a quiet giant. Sal Buscema—a pillar of Marvel storytelling—has passed at the age of 89.

Sal wasn’t flashy. He didn’t chase hype. He worked. Decade after decade, issue after issue, he gave Marvel its backbone. From Spider-Man to The Spectacular Spider-Man, Hulk, Thor, Avengers, and beyond—if a book needed reliability, clarity, and momentum, Sal Buscema was the guy.

His art moved.
His action read clean.
His characters felt solid and human.

That’s the kind of craftsmanship that doesn’t shout—but it lasts forever.

Entire generations of readers grew up on his pages without even realizing how much he shaped their idea of Marvel Comics. That’s legacy. That’s permanence.

Rest easy, Sal.
Your lines, your stories, and your impact aren’t going anywhere. 🖤🖊️

Day Six of My Wolverine Collection 🐺

 Another absolute banger added to the lineup.

This era of Wolverine is peak mood: gritty, feral, and unapologetically violent in tone without ever losing its emotional weight. Logan isn’t a superhero here—he’s a weapon struggling against monsters, including the ones wearing human skin… and the ones inside himself.

The cover alone says it all:

• Raw brutality

• Zero glamor

• Maximum consequence

This is the version of Wolverine that made the character endure—street-level horror mixed with berserker rage and just enough humanity to keep it tragic.

Day Six down.
Still no filler.
Still all killer.

🐺🔥

Comic Book Purists Shouldn’t Be Taken Seriously

 Let’s get this out of the way: comic book purists—the loudest, most rigid, gatekeeping voices in the hobby—are doing more harm than good, and the industry would lose absolutely nothing by ignoring them.

Purism in comics isn’t about preservation or history anymore. It’s about control.

The Myth of the “One True Way” to Collect

Purists love rules.
What counts.
What doesn’t.
What you’re “allowed” to like, collect, slab, read, or display.

But comics have never existed in a vacuum. The medium evolved through reinvention, reinterpretation, international editions, reprints, homages, facsimiles, and experimental formats. Pretending otherwise is historical illiteracy dressed up as superiority.

Facsimiles: The Dumbest Hill to Die On

The outrage over grading facsimiles is one of the most unserious arguments in the hobby.

No one—no one—is confusing a facsimile with an original first print.
They are clearly labeled.
They exist to be accessible.
They allow collectors to own iconic books without needing a second mortgage.

Grading a facsimile isn’t “destroying the hobby.”
It’s preserving interest in it.

If anything, facsimiles protect originals by reducing handling and demand pressure. Screaming about slabs on facsimiles is just performative outrage from people who need something to feel important about.

Foreign Editions: The Purists’ Biggest Blind Spot

The dismissal of Foreign Editions is where purists expose themselves completely.

Foreign Editions are not reprints in the dismissive sense they love to imply.
They are licensed, paid-for, country-specific editions, often with:

• Unique print runs

• Distinct cover stock

• Different color separations

• Cultural and historical context

• Entirely different market histories

Countries paid for publishing rights. They printed locally. They distributed locally. That makes them legitimate Editions, full stop.

Calling them “lesser” isn’t just wrong—it’s American-centric nonsense that ignores how global comics actually became global.

If anything, Foreign Editions represent the true expansion of comics as a medium beyond U.S. borders. Dismissing them is ignorance masquerading as expertise.

Grading Isn’t Validation—It’s Documentation

Another purist fantasy is that grading is about approval or status.

It isn’t.

Grading is documentation:

• Condition

• Authenticity

• Preservation

That’s it.

If someone wants a facsimile graded? Fine.
If someone wants a Foreign Edition slabbed? Fine.
If someone collects raw books in Mylar and never grades a thing? Also fine.

The hobby does not belong to purists. It belongs to collectors.

Gatekeeping Is Not Passion

The loudest purists often claim they’re protecting comics. They’re not.

They’re protecting:

• Their perceived authority

• Their shrinking definition of legitimacy

• Their discomfort with change

Comics survived the Golden Age, the Comics Code, the speculator crash, digital publishing, global markets, and modern diversification. They’ll survive facsimiles, Foreign Editions, and collectors who don’t ask permission.

Final Thought

Comics are not a religion.
There is no orthodoxy.
There is no sacred checklist.

If your enjoyment of comics depends on telling others they’re “doing it wrong,” you don’t love the medium—you love gatekeeping.

And that’s why comic book purists shouldn’t be taken seriously.

Day Five of My Wolverine Collection 🐺

 We’re back in the jungle with Wolverine Vol. 2 #5 (1989), a classic Madripoor-era issue that leans hard into pulpy action and pure Logan chaos. Explosions, mercenaries, and Wolverine diving headfirst into gunfire—this is the kind of cover that perfectly captures why this solo run still hits decades later.

This issue continues the gritty tone that made Volume 2 iconic: Logan operating solo, morally gray, violent when necessary, and absolutely fearless. No cosmic nonsense, no team safety net—just Wolverine vs. the world.

Another brick laid in the collection, and honestly, one of those covers that never gets old.

On to Day Six.

Gaming Doesn’t Create Violence — Blaming It Is a Lazy Distraction from the Real Causes

 Every few years, the same tired argument resurfaces: video games cause violence.

And every time, it collapses under even the lightest scrutiny.

The reality is simple and well-supported: gaming does not meaningfully contribute to real-world violence. The evidence has been examined for decades, across cultures, generations, and technologies—and it keeps reaching the same conclusion.

If people are serious about understanding violence, they need to stop scapegoating entertainment and start looking at ideology, power structures, and belief systems that justify harm.

---

Gaming Is a Global Constant — Violence Is Not

Video games are played:

• by hundreds of millions of people

• across every age group

• across every culture

• across peaceful and violent societies alike

If games caused violence, we’d see consistent correlations worldwide.

We don’t.

Countries with:

• massive gaming populations

• high exposure to violent games

• strong gaming cultures

often have lower rates of violent crime than places with minimal gaming presence.

Gaming doesn’t predict violence.
Culture, ideology, and social conditions do.

---

What the Research Actually Shows

Decades of psychological and sociological research consistently find:

• no causal link between gaming and violent crime

• no predictive value for aggression leading to real-world harm

• no long-term behavioral impact tied to violent games

At most, games can cause temporary arousal—the same response you get from sports, movies, or competition. That’s not violence. That’s stimulation.

Blaming games persists not because it’s true—but because it’s easy.

---

Where Violence Does Consistently Come From

When violence is examined seriously—historically and globally—two factors appear again and again:

1) Rigid, Draconian Ideologies

Violence thrives where belief systems:

• divide the world into “pure” vs. “corrupt”

• dehumanize outsiders

• justify punishment as moral duty

• treat dissent as evil

• elevate obedience over empathy

Whether religious or political, absolutist ideologies are responsible for the overwhelming majority of organized violence in human history.

Violence isn’t caused by play.
It’s caused by certainty without accountability.

---

2) Religion as a Historical Driver of Justified Violence

This is not an attack on individual faith or personal belief.
It is a historical observation.

Across centuries, violence has been:

• justified as divine will

• sanctified through doctrine

• excused as necessary purification

• institutionalized through religious authority

From crusades to inquisitions to sectarian conflicts, religion has repeatedly provided moral cover for brutality—especially when combined with state power.

That doesn’t mean all religion causes violence.
It means religion has been used to legitimize it far more often than entertainment ever has.

---

Gaming Does the Opposite of What Critics Claim

Gaming often:

• builds empathy through perspective

• encourages cooperation and problem-solving

• provides safe outlets for competition

• fosters global communities

• teaches failure, resilience, and experimentation

Games are structured experiences with rules, consequences, and boundaries—exactly the opposite of chaotic real-world violence.

If anything, gaming absorbs aggression rather than creates it.

---

Why Gaming Is Still Blamed

Because blaming games:

• avoids confronting systemic issues

• protects powerful institutions from scrutiny

• deflects responsibility from ideology

• simplifies complex problems into sound bites

It’s moral panic, recycled for a new generation.

---

Final Word

Violence doesn’t come from play.
It comes from belief systems that sanctify harm, from rigid ideologies that erase empathy, and from institutions that reward obedience over humanity.

Gaming is a cultural scapegoat—nothing more.

If society wants to reduce violence, it needs to stop blaming controllers and start interrogating:

• dogma

• absolutism

• unchecked authority

• ideologies that justify cruelty

Because pretending games are the problem isn’t just wrong.

It’s a convenient lie that keeps the real causes safely out of reach.

Grailkeeping Is Poisoning Comic Collecting — and It Needs to Stop

 There’s a quiet but deeply corrosive behavior spreading through comic collecting, and it deserves to be called out plainly:

Grailkeeping.

The idea that only certain books “count” as grails.
That only certain collectors are “serious.”
That only certain tastes are valid.

It’s nonsense — and it’s actively harming the hobby.

---

What Grailkeeping Actually Is

Grailkeeping happens when people:

• dismiss personal grails as “not real”

• police what qualifies as “important”

• use market value as a proxy for legitimacy

• treat collecting like a hierarchy instead of a passion

• belittle newer collectors for not chasing the same books

If a grail only “counts” when it hits a specific dollar amount or appears on someone else’s checklist, then it was never about collecting — it was about status.

---

Grails Are Personal — Always Have Been

A grail is:

• the book you’ve chased for years

• the issue tied to a memory

• the one you sold and regretted

• the cover that made you a fan

• the foreign edition you never thought you’d find

• the low-grade survivor that means something to you

It does not require:

• market consensus

• auction records

• influencer approval

• census statistics

• gatekeeper validation

If it matters to you, it’s a grail. Full stop.

---

Grailkeeping Is Just Insecurity Wearing a Price Tag

Let’s be honest.

Grailkeeping isn’t about protecting history.
It’s about:

• flexing

• hierarchy

• control

• fear of losing perceived authority

When someone mocks another collector’s grail, they’re not defending the hobby — they’re advertising that their identity is tied to exclusivity, not love of comics.

That’s fragile behavior.

---

It Hurts New Collectors the Most

Nothing drives people out of the hobby faster than being told:

• “That doesn’t count.”

• “Come back when you can afford a real grail.”

• “You don’t understand collecting yet.”

Comics survive because new collectors fall in love with them.
Grailkeeping teaches them that love isn’t welcome unless it’s expensive.

That’s how hobbies die.

---

The Market Doesn’t Need Your Policing

The market already does what it does:

• prices fluctuate

• tastes change

• keys rise and fall

• new grails emerge

Trying to freeze collecting into a rigid, elitist checklist ignores reality.

Today’s “minor key” is tomorrow’s cultural milestone.
Yesterday’s grail might fade — and that’s okay.

Collecting is living history, not a museum frozen in time.

---

Final Word

Grailkeeping doesn’t protect the hobby.
It shrinks it.

Comics are about stories, art, memory, and connection — not ranking each other’s shelves.

If someone finally lands a book they’ve dreamed about for years, the correct response is “congratulations,” not “that doesn’t count.”

Let people love what they love.
Let people collect how they collect.
Let people define their own grails.

Because the only thing worse than a fake grail
is a fake authority telling others what joy is allowed.

Grailkeeping needs to end — for the hobby’s sake.

Rose Estes Was a Critical Writer in Dungeons & Dragons — and Her Contribution Has Been Undervalued for Decades

 Let’s get this straight, cleanly and without hedging:

Rose Estes was a foundational writer in the early Dungeons & Dragons literary ecosystem, and her work played a major role in expanding the audience, tone, and accessibility of D&D fiction.

Not an illustrator.
Not a footnote.
A writer whose books reached readers the core game books never could.

---

She Helped Build D&D’s Reading Audience

Rose Estes was one of the earliest and most prolific writers of TSR-era Dungeons & Dragons fiction, particularly through:

• Greyhawk Adventures

• Forgotten Realms–adjacent fantasy

• standalone TSR paperbacks designed to introduce new readers to the worlds of D&D

Her novels were often entry points:

• for younger readers

• for women readers

• for people who didn’t yet play the game

• for readers intimidated by dense rulebooks

These books converted readers into players — something the hobby desperately needed in its early years.

That is not secondary work.
That is infrastructure.

---

“Accessible” Does Not Mean “Inferior”

For years, Rose Estes’ writing was dismissed with coded language:

• “light fantasy”

• “romantic”

• “simple”

• “not serious D&D”

This criticism misses the point entirely.

Her writing:

• emphasized character over crunch

• centered emotional stakes

• made fantasy readable without gatekeeping

• invited new demographics into a hobby dominated by insular thinking

You don’t grow a genre by writing only for the initiated.
You grow it by lowering the barrier to entry without lowering quality.

That’s exactly what Estes did.

---

She Expanded Who D&D Was For

Before “inclusivity” was a buzzword, Rose Estes’ work:

• centered women as protagonists

• treated relationships as meaningful narrative engines

• portrayed heroism as moral choice, not just combat output

• emphasized wonder, danger, and consequence

She helped normalize the idea that:

• fantasy could be emotional

• women belonged in these worlds

• D&D stories didn’t need to be grim or brutal to be legitimate

This mattered — and it still does.

---

Why Her Recognition Matters Now

Rose Estes is often overlooked because:

• she wasn’t writing game mechanics

• she wasn’t part of the “hardcore” rules culture

• her work didn’t cater to power fantasies

• she didn’t posture or mythologize herself

But Dungeons & Dragons is not just rules.

It is:

• worlds

• stories

• imagination

• people discovering fantasy for the first time

Estes helped make that discovery possible.

---

Final Word

You don’t get D&D’s cultural longevity without its fiction.
You don’t get mass readership without writers who know how to invite people in.
And you don’t get a diverse fandom by writing only for the loudest voices in the room.

Rose Estes earned her place in Dungeons & Dragons history as a writer.

Not as a footnote.
Not as “adjacent.”
As a pillar of early D&D storytelling.

Recognition isn’t charity.

It’s accuracy.

Female Creators and Collectors Are Not an “Exception” — They’re a Core Part of Comics and Always Have Been

 Let’s kill this tired, bad-faith narrative once and for all:

Female creators and collectors are not an anomaly.
They are not a trend.
They are not a novelty.
They are not a marketing checkbox.
They are not “new.”

They are — and always have been — a fundamental factor in the comic book world.

The idea that women are somehow “out of place” in comics isn’t just wrong. It’s historically illiterate.

---

Women Built Comics — Period

From the very beginning, women have been:

• Writers

• Artists

• Editors

• Colorists

• Letterers

• Publishers

• Archivists

• Historians

• Retailers

• Collectors

• Critics

Without women, the medium as we know it does not exist.

Names like:

• Marie Severin

• Ramona Fradon

• Trina Robbins

• Louise Simonson

• Ann Nocenti

• Karen Berger

• Jill Thompson

• Colleen Doran

• Gail Simone

• Fiona Staples

• Becky Cloonan

• Kelly Sue DeConnick

…aren’t footnotes. They’re pillars.

The idea that comics are a “male space” is a myth created by marketing departments, not history.

---

Female Collectors Aren’t a Side Quest — They’re the Market

Women don’t just read comics.
They collect them.
They speculate.
They preserve.
They grade.
They archive.
They curate.
They fund the aftermarket.
They drive demand.

They chase:

• keys

• variants

• foreign editions

• Golden Age

• Silver Age

• Bronze Age

• Modern keys

• indie books

• undergrounds

• zines

• art books

And they do it with just as much knowledge, intent, and seriousness as anyone else.

If you think female collectors are “casual,” that says more about your ignorance than their participation.

---

The Gatekeeping Problem

The real issue isn’t women in comics.

It’s fragile gatekeeping.

There’s a subset of fandom that feels threatened by:

• women knowing more

• women collecting better books

• women driving prices

• women creating acclaimed work

• women criticizing the medium

• women refusing to play mascot roles

So instead of engaging honestly, they:

• minimize

• patronize

• dismiss

• tokenize

• sexualize

• infantilize

• question legitimacy

• demand credentials they never demand of men

That’s not protecting comics.
That’s insecurity.

---

Being Taken Seriously Is Not a Favor

Women in comics don’t need permission.
They don’t need validation.
They don’t need male approval.
They don’t need to “prove” they belong.

They already do.

Taking female creators and collectors seriously isn’t performative allyship — it’s baseline respect.

Anything less is a failure of the community, not the individual.

---

The Industry Knows This — Even If Some Fans Don’t

Publishers, retailers, auction houses, grading companies, and convention organizers already understand this reality:

Women are:

• buyers

• tastemakers

• critics

• professionals

• historians

• creators

• cultural drivers

The only people still pretending otherwise are the ones stuck clinging to a version of comics that never actually existed.

---

Final Word

Female creators and collectors aren’t “changing” comics.

They are comics.

They always have been.

And any space that refuses to acknowledge that isn’t defending tradition —
it’s advertising its own irrelevance.

Comics are bigger than insecurity.
Comics are smarter than gatekeeping.
Comics are richer because women are part of them.

That’s not an opinion.
That’s reality.

The Problem with Shine Comics — And the Anti-Intellectualism Rotting Modern Comics Culture

 There’s a deeper issue infecting parts of the indie comics space right now, and Shine Comics is just a symptom of it — not the disease itself.

The disease is anti-intellectualism.

Not disagreement.
Not ideological difference.
Not creative diversity.

But the active rejection of thought, complexity, research, history, nuance, literacy, and critical thinking — replaced with outrage marketing, shallow aesthetics, algorithm bait, and performative “anti-elite” posturing.

What Anti-Intellectualism Looks Like in Comics

It shows up as:

• “Comics should just be fun, stop thinking so much”

• “Don’t analyze it, just consume it”

• “Story doesn’t matter, message doesn’t matter”

• “Lore is for losers”

• “Themes are propaganda”

• “Writers are the enemy”

• “Critics are elitists”

• “Reading comprehension is gatekeeping”

This isn’t populism.
This isn’t accessibility.
This is intellectual erosion.

It’s the replacement of storytelling with branding.
Narrative with marketing.
Ideas with identity posturing.
Substance with aesthetics.

Shine Comics as a Case Study

Shine Comics doesn’t represent innovation — it represents flattening.

Not elevation of new voices.
Not narrative experimentation.
Not formal risk-taking.
Not literary ambition.

But content-first production:

• Visual-first

• slogan-first

• controversy-first

• ideology-first

• algorithm-first

The books don’t feel designed to be read — they feel designed to be shared, clipped, marketed, and defended.

That’s not publishing.
That’s content farming with panels.

Comics Were Never Anti-Intellectual

This is the lie people keep pushing.

Comics have always been:

• Political

• Philosophical

• Allegorical

• Thematic

• Critical

• Symbolic

• Subtext-driven

• Historically informed

• Socially reflective

From:

• X-Men = civil rights allegory

• Watchmen = deconstruction of power

• Sandman = literary mythological synthesis

• Swamp Thing = eco-philosophy

• Hellblazer = political theology

• Black Panther = post-colonial theory

• Daredevil = Catholic guilt and moral absolutism

• Captain America = anti-fascist propaganda

• Magneto = Holocaust trauma politics

Comics were never stupid — they were accessible.
Those are not the same thing.

Anti-Intellectualism Is Cultural Decline, Not Rebellion

The current trend sells this idea that rejecting complexity is “freedom.”

It isn’t.

It’s lowering the ceiling.

It’s:

• devaluing writers

• devaluing editors

• devaluing research

• devaluing literacy

• devaluing criticism

• devaluing storytelling craft

• devaluing narrative structure

• devaluing symbolic meaning

It trains audiences to:

• not analyze

• not question

• not interpret

• not learn

• not engage

• not grow

That’s not democratization — that’s dumbing down culture.

The Real Damage

Anti-intellectual comics culture doesn’t just hurt art — it hurts readers.

It creates:

• shallow fandoms

• identity-driven consumption

• tribal marketing bubbles

• aesthetic loyalty instead of narrative loyalty

• creators treated as brands instead of thinkers

• books treated as merch instead of literature

It turns comics into products, not works.

The Hard Truth

If your comic rejects:

• theme

• symbolism

• critique

• history

• complexity

• moral tension

• narrative ambiguity

• intellectual engagement

…it isn’t “pure entertainment.”

It’s empty consumption.

And that space will always be louder than it is meaningful.

Final Reality Check

Shine Comics isn’t dangerous because of ideology.
It’s dangerous because of shallowness.

Because it contributes to a culture where:

• thinking is mocked

• analysis is attacked

• critics are demonized

• literacy is framed as elitism

• complexity is treated as corruption

That’s not counterculture.

That’s cultural regression.

Comics deserve better than anti-intellectual branding pipelines.
Readers deserve better than ideological content factories.
Creators deserve better than marketing-first ecosystems.

Comics are art.
Comics are literature.
Comics are culture.
Comics are history.
Comics are politics.
Comics are philosophy.
Comics are identity.
Comics are theory.
Comics are critique.

They always have been.

And any movement that tries to turn them into thoughtless content isn’t saving comics —
it’s hollowing them out.

Captain America Would NOT Support ICE — And the History Is Right There on the Page

 I have been seeing so many posts about how Steve Rogers aka Captain America would support ICE and these "Americans" that make these claims have no clue what Captain America stands for.

Let’s be clear about one thing up front: Captain America has always been political. He was born political. He debuted in 1941 punching fascism in the face before the U.S. government even entered World War II. Pretending he’d suddenly shrug at state abuse because it’s wrapped in a flag is ahistorical nonsense.

What Captain America Actually Represents

Steve Rogers isn’t a symbol of authority. He’s a symbol of principle.

• He stands for civil liberties

• He defends the powerless

• He distrusts unchecked government power

• He walks away when institutions betray their own ideals

This is the same character who:

• Turned against the U.S. government during Secret Empire (1974) over illegal surveillance and repression

• Resigned the mantle rather than become a tool of the state

• Opposed internment, profiling, and collective punishment whenever Marvel bothered to engage honestly with history

Captain America’s loyalty is to people, not badges.

ICE vs. Cap’s Moral Compass

Modern immigration enforcement tactics—family separation, indefinite detention, militarized raids, lack of due process—are exactly the kind of institutional cruelty Cap has always opposed in-story.

This isn’t about borders. It’s about how power is used.

Captain America has never supported:

• Criminalizing existence

• Punishing children to deter adults

• Bureaucratic violence carried out “because it’s the law”

That “just following orders” logic? That’s the villain speech in Captain America comics. Every time.

“But He’s Patriotic!”

Yes—and that’s the point people miss on purpose.

Captain America’s patriotism is aspirational, not authoritarian.
He represents what America claims to be, not what it does when no one’s watching.

That’s why he punches Nazis.
That’s why he exposes corrupt agencies.
That’s why he sides with refugees, dissidents, and the persecuted.

If your version of Captain America is pro–mass detention, pro–collective punishment, and pro–fear-based enforcement, you didn’t read the comics—you skimmed the covers.

The Historical Irony

Captain America Comics #1 didn’t ask for permission.
It didn’t wait for public approval.
It didn’t say “both sides have a point.”

It took a stance against authoritarian cruelty before it was safe to do so.

Trying to retrofit Captain America into a mascot for harsh enforcement policies is revisionism—plain and simple.

Final Word

Captain America wouldn’t stand with ICE.
He’d be standing between ICE and the people being abused by it.

And he’d still be holding the shield.

If that makes anyone uncomfortable, good.
Captain America was never meant to be comfortable—he was meant to be right.

🛡️

The New Avengers #11 Minor Key – 1st Appearance of Ronin (Maya Lopez)

 This one often flies under the radar, but it absolutely deserves its flowers.

The New Avengers #11 (2005) marks the first appearance of Ronin, the identity later revealed to be Maya Lopez—a character who would go on to become far more important to Marvel continuity than many initially realized.

Why This Book Matters

• First appearance of Ronin – A mantle that would later be worn by multiple characters, but it starts here.

• Maya Lopez’s evolution – From Echo to Ronin, this issue is a pivotal step in her arc.

• Street-level Marvel storytelling – This era of New Avengers leaned hard into grounded, gritty narratives post–Avengers Disassembled.

• David Finch cover – Peak 2000s Finch: moody, aggressive, and instantly recognizable.

This is a minor key by market standards, but a major character beat in hindsight—especially given Maya’s later prominence across comics and screen adaptations.

---

The Ronin Identity

Ronin wasn’t just a costume change—it represented:

• A rejection of the system

• A move into moral gray areas

• A symbol of fractured heroism in Marvel’s post-9/11 era

That thematic weight is why this book still resonates.

---

Collector Take

This isn’t a hype book.
It’s a character-first key, and those are the ones that age best.

If you collect with an eye for:

• Long-term relevance

• Character-driven significance

• Underappreciated modern keys

This one belongs in the box.

Sometimes the minor keys tell the better story. 🥷📚